The Battle Of The Diets: Is Anyone Winning (at Losing?)

Health&Diets — By admin on February 3, 2010 at 12:39 pm

January 17, 2008 presentation by Christopher Gardner for the Stanford School of Medicine Medcast lecture series.

The case for low-carbohydrate diets is gaining weight. Christopher Gardner, PhD, …

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
Tags: , , , ,

    10 Comments

  • polymorphously says:

    “If they all reduced the amount of calories they say they did, they all would have lost 40 pounds. So they exaggerated.” Well, no. Reducing calories reduces basal metabolism. For some people, it reduces basal metabolism quite dramatically.

  • Stonewalljackson7 says:

    You must be exceedingly stupid then

  • topheramazz says:

    @Stonewalljackson7 check out “metabolic typing” by wolcottit will explain alot about how certain cultures eat certain foods and thrive.inuit indians consume mostly meat and fat and very little carbos- and have exceptional health and longevity.

  • Stonewalljackson7 says:

    The inuit have a relatively short life span

  • topheramazz says:

    dont know where u pulled that out of- but ok.

  • Stonewalljackson7 says:

    I did check it out, took the test and it said i’m a carbo type. and recommends exactly the diet i’m on.

  • tobarstep says:

    Waterbury and Berardi are both smart guys. In fact, I do have books by both of them. They’re both first and foremost businessmen though. They’re both selling you something as their primary objective.

  • Stonewalljackson7 says:

    wrong, the average person in okinawa pre 1950 consumed only a small percentage of meat in their diet.

  • tobarstep says:

    You’re using the standard vegetarian definition of meat. They ate a great deal of fish, which is meat. Just not “red” meat.

  • Stonewalljackson7 says:

    coastal oki,s ate fish not the inland oki,s

Leave a Reply

Trackbacks

Leave a Trackback